2-4 May 2022
Harnack-Haus & Zoom
Europe/Berlin timezone

New structure features revealed in isomeric spectroscopy in the Z ~ 82, N ~ 104 region

Not scheduled
1h
Hahn-Hörsaal & 640 2973 0764 (Harnack-Haus & Zoom)

Hahn-Hörsaal & 640 2973 0764

Harnack-Haus & Zoom

Ihnestrasse 16-20 14195 Berlin-Dahlem Germany
Poster

Speaker

W. Q. Zhang (Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences)

Description

Neutron-deficient nuclei around mid-shell at $N \sim 104$ in the lead region provide many examples of shape coexistence and shape isomers. In order to study shape coexistence in this region, prompt and delayed $\gamma$-ray spectroscopy of the $^{187}$Pb, $^{183}$Hg and $^{188}$Bi isotopes produced in the reaction $^{50}$Cr+$^{142}$Nd$\to$$^{192}$Po$^{*}$ has been performed at the Argonne Gas-Filled Analyzer.
In $^{187}$Pb, a new 5.15(15)-$\mu$s isomeric state at 308 keV above the spherical 3/2$^-$ ground state was identified. A strongly-coupled band is observed on top of this isomer, which is nearly identical to the one built on the prolate 7/2$^{-}$[514] Nilsson state in the isotone $^{185}$Hg. Based on this similarity and on the result of the potential-energy surface calculations, the new isomer in $^{187}$Pb was proposed to be prolate with $J^{\pi}$ = 7/2$^{-}$ and classified as a shape isomer. The retarded character of the 308-keV (7/2$^-$)$\to$3/2$^-_{gs}$ transition with a deduced $B(E2)$ = 5.6(2) $\times$ $10^{-4}$ W.u. can be well explained by the significant difference between the prolate parent and spherical daughter configurations, leading to the shape isomerism.
In $^{183}$Hg, the decay of the nearly spherical 13/2$^+$ isomeric state was first observed following the $\alpha$ decay of the 13/2$^+$ isomer in $^{187}$Pb. By the α − γ correlation measurement, the half-life of this isomer was measured to be T1/2 = 290(30) μs. This isomer was proposed to deexcite by retarded $M2$ transition, which can be explained by the notable shape change between the initial and the final states.
Recently, a strong shape staggering was found in the charge radii of $^{187,188,189}$Bi. To further characterize this phenomenon in $^{188}$Bi, its in-beam and decay spectroscopy was studied in the same experiment. A new 0.25(5)-$\mu$s isomeric state decaying via a 243-keV transition to the (10$^{-}$) $^{188m}$Bi was identified.

[1] P. Möller et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 212501 (2009)
[2] W. Q. Zhang et al., submitted to Physics Letters B.
[3] A. Barzakh et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 192501 (2021).
.

Primary authors

W. Q. Zhang (Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences) A. N. Andreyev Z. Liu H. Huang Prof. D. Seweryniak (Physics Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439, USA) Z. H. Li (State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology, School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China) J. G. Li (Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China) C. Y. Guo (State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology, School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China) D. T. Doherty (Department of Physics, University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7XH, United Kingdom) A. E. Barzakh (Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute, NRC Kurchatov Institute, 188300 Gatchina, Russia) P. Van. Duppen (KU Leuven, Instituut voor Kern- en Stralingsfysica, 3001 Leuven, Belgium) J. G. Cubiss (Department of Physics, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, United Kingdom) B. Andel (KU Leuven, Instituut voor Kern- en Stralingsfysica, 3001 Leuven, Belgium) S. Antalic (Department of Nuclear Physics and Biophysics) M. Block (Helmholtz-Institut Mainz, Mainz, 55128, Germany) A. Bronis (Department of Nuclear Physics and Biophysics) M. P. Carpenter (Physics Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439, USA) P. Copp (Physics Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439, USA) B. Ding (Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences) Z. Favier (IRFU, CEA, Université Paris-Saclay, F-91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France) F. Giacoppo (Helmholtz-Institut Mainz, Mainz, 55128, Germany) T. H. Huang (Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China) B. Kindler (GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung Darmstadt, Darmstadt, 64291, Germany) F. G. Kondev (Physics Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439, USA) T. Lauritsen (Physics Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439, USA) G. S. Li (Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China) B. Lommel (GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung Darmstadt, Darmstadt, 64291, Germany) H. Y. Lu (Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China) M. A. Monthery (Department of Physics, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, United Kingdom) P. Moˇsaˇt (Department of Nuclear Physics and Biophysics) Y. F. Niu (Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China) C. Raison (Department of Physics, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, United Kingdom) W. Reviol (Physics Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439, USA) G. Savard (Physics Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439, USA) S. Stolze (Physics Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439, USA) G. Wilson (Physics Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439, USA) H. Y. Wu (State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology, School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China) Z. H. Wang (Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China) F. R. Xu (State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology, School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China) X. H. Yu (Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China) Q. B. Zeng (Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China) X. H. Zhou (Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China)

Presentation Materials