Welcome Room: SB3 3.170a Seminarraum Theorie -- Give first version to JSC by October 1 (JSC Oct. 22-23) -- Presentation to Supervisory Board of GSI → GSI Aufsichtsrat: Meeting Nov. 14, 2024 -- Deadline final Report to Helmholtz: 2 months before Center Evaluation -> Feb. 1, 2025 (strict!)

Status Report 2021 - 2024 Room: SB3 3.170a Seminarraum Theorie -- Corrections as soon as possible. 1.st October is the hard deadline for the scientific part. -- Link to the master document: https://sf.gsi.de/f/b4f9a1b2f9224c4ea26d/?dl=1 -- Link to the high resolution figures: https://sf.gsi.de/d/4d8ac17302214367873e/ (The CML text in the Masterfile is not updated) -- 20240923 CML Status_Report_Vol-I_GSI_draft_CED_YL_1.docs (attached) is the current working draft for CML with all comments included -- 20240919 CML Status_Report_Vol-I_GSI_draft.docx with comment until nuclear astrophysics -- Luminita's, Yvonne's and Thomas's review comments: As general remarks: * Please formulate clearly that you achieved the milestones X; Y; Z and if not give a sound explanation why. * Be very focused when you motivate your activities. They should follow GSI/HIM specific goals and tools. * Choose carefully your highlights and point out clearly in the text. Not all scientific results can be reported as highlights. * Try to keep a good balance between high-level description and the necessary technical details. * Whenever you mention a results, highlight or publication give a Ref. (published result) for it. * Do not put together figures that are not related with each other. The # of pages we can reduce by other means. * Check that BESIII and BES-II are consistently written. Most of the comments we had, are written explicitly as a separate comment. Some paragraphs or sentences are marked in yellow, green or red. The “secret” code is: ** yellow: it should be read again, Ref. is missing, Fig. citation should be checked, the formulation should be more precise/paragraph should be shortened. ** green: The paragraph is on the wrong place. ** red: if not a simple mark for a link to another topic, LK II section, it means the paragraph should be urgently checked and corrected. ++++++++++++++++++++++++ • we have far too many references! I kindly ask everyone to check which references are not needed and report this directly to Luminita. Since every reference is a cross-reference, removing a reference from the list will automatically remove it from the text and keep the correct numbering. • The formatting of the references is only partially done, because we have to remove 50% of the references to fit 1.5 pages. Dear colleagues, please format all your references in the correct style, example provided by Luminita: [1] J. Hammelmann and H. Elfner, Impact of hadronic interactions and conservation laws on cumulants of conserved charges in a dynamical model,Phys. Rev. C 107, no.4, 044910 (2023), DOI:10.1103/PhysRevC.107.044910 • The figures in the "Hadrons" section are still missing on sf.gsi.de, please upload them these days.